Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Waterside Garden Centre
Sponsored by
Expert garden advice always on hand.
Big Enough For Choice, Small Enough To Care.
 
 
Saturday, 5th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

CAMPAIGN: Bring back £1 parking at Rutland Water



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

TODAY the Mercury is calling on readers to join our fight to stop the excessive parking charges that are driving people away from Rutland Water.
People are being forced to pay £3 to park at the reservoir's car parks after Anglian Water scrapped the £1 short stay fee.

The move has prompted a barrage of letters from incensed Mercury readers and businesses fear the damage it could cause.

----------
Add your support to our campaign: click here
----------

Now the Mercury is urging Anglian Water to reinstate the £1 charge for an hour's parking to allow local people to enjoy the reservoir.

We want you to show your support by signing the coupon on this page or online at www.stamfordmercury.co.uk

In a statement to the Mercury two weeks ago, when we first reported on the anger the parking changes had sparked, a spokesman for Anglian Water defended the decision, and said the company would stick by it.

"This is something we have made our mind up about and there is no going back, no matter what protests there may be," he said.

But, the Mercury believes the axing of the short-stay charge is hitting local people and local businesses – and Anglian Water, to whom we pay water rates, should reconsider.

Tim Harris, manager of Rutland Cycles at Whitwell, said: "The incentive has gone for people, primarily locals, to walk the dog or have a cup of tea – £3 for a half-hour visit is extremely expensive and they won't pay that."

Businesses have asked Anglian Water to reinstate the £1 rate and raise the all-day fee to £3.50 in summer.

Mr Harris said: "We don't think they listen to us. People who are working here are telling them visitor numbers have been affected but they have just blamed the weather."

Pensioners Gil and Maggie Marren, from Thorne, South Yorkshire, are dog-sitting in Manton and were at Rutland Water yesterday.

Mr Marren said: "If we were just visiting for a walk by the lake, we wouldn't pay £3 to park the car. It's just too expensive."

Some visitors already park on roadside verges around Rutland Water rather than pay and people are pressing for extra patrols or more yellow lines to reinforce safety in the area.

"This is happening a lot," said Mark Latham, owner of The Noel at Whitwell. "It's very dangerous when it gets crowded because there are dozens of kids running around."

Adrian Chappell, who runs catering kiosks in the car parks, said: "We are witnessing people turning away from the car park.

"The whole tenant base is up in arms. We are fighting this issue day by day at the highest level."

Dan Baker, media manager for Anglian Water, said: "We have to maintain our recreation sites using money generated by the sites. The funding for this cannot come from water bills.

"As maintenance costs have, inevitably, gone up, so must the amount of money the sites generate.

"All the money raised through parking goes back into running these enormously popular sites."

Mr Baker recommended buying a season ticket for £30 per year.

The full article contains 529 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 June 2008 2:01 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Stamford
 
Prev
1
Next
1

George Morley,

PETITCODIAC, CANADA 03/05/2008 04:01:26
I think that increased charges like this are totally out of order and unnecessary. Surely Rutland Water belongs to the people and whilst the managers have to manage it, that is no licence to gouge the public. A reasonable charge was being made and to triple the charge is nothing less than criminal. OK, prices increase over time and a reasonable increase would perhaps be acceptable - say 1.25. With the increase they have made there will be less people using it and most likely a loss of revenue at the end of the day so where is the logic in that?
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.